Group 1: Difference between revisions

From nldlab
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


=== Previous Experiments===
=== Previous Experiments===
Binks and van de Water [2] choose to examine the stability of faraday waves as a function of excitation frequency. The wavelength of each mode can be determined from the inviscid deep fluid dispersion relation: [[File:Eqn1.gif]] <br />
Binks and van de Water [2] choose to examine the stability of faraday waves as a function of excitation frequency. The wavelength of each mode can be determined from the inviscid deep fluid dispersion relation: [[File:Eqn1.gif]] where: <br />
where [[File:Eqn2.gif]] (g is acceleration due to gravity, k is the wave number, and 2w is the excitation frequency.
[[File:Eqn2.gif]] (g is acceleration due to gravity, k is the wave number, and 2w is the excitation frequency) <br />
[[File:Eqn3.gif]] (alpha is the surface tension, and rho is the density)





Revision as of 01:24, 20 October 2011

Faraday Waves and Nonlinear Patterns

Background

Eponymously discovered by Faraday[1], Faraday Waves are standing waves on a fluid caused by vertical oscillatory motion. At given frequencies, these standing waves (vibrating at held the driving frequency) give surface paterns of n dimensional rotational symmetry; mainly square, hexagonal, and 8-fold quasi-static patterns. The wavelength of the standing waves are a function of viscosity, surface tension and density. Hence, understanding the relationship between these variables and the wavelength, will allow oscillation frequencies to be selected that produce standing waves of order n.

Previous Experiments

Binks and van de Water [2] choose to examine the stability of faraday waves as a function of excitation frequency. The wavelength of each mode can be determined from the inviscid deep fluid dispersion relation: Eqn1.gif where:
Eqn2.gif (g is acceleration due to gravity, k is the wave number, and 2w is the excitation frequency)
Eqn3.gif (alpha is the surface tension, and rho is the density)


Experiment

This experiment is designed to reproduce the results of quantifying the observance of these waves by Binks and W. van de Water [2]. The expected results should also agree with Zhang and Vinals' [3] prediction of the amplitudes of the standing waves. The experiment will go a step further and not only test the theory out for different fluids (including a non-newtonian fluid), but for different oscillatory patterns (square, sinusoidal,and triangle) .

FaradayExperiment.jpg
  1. Reproduce the experiments of Binks and Van de Water
    1. Fill a 440 mm diameter circular container with 20 mm height of experimental fluid
    2. Attach a 2 cm thick plate on the bottom of the container and a hollow conical structure attached to an electromagnetic exciter below that.
    3. Place piezo-electric accelerometers on the cone (one on bottom, two on top) to measure the acceleration cone. This allows control of the oscillation frequency.
    4. A high speed CCD camera is placed above the container to take snapshots of the standing waves. It is required that the frames per second of the snapshots are greater than the oscillation period of the standing waves.
    5. The amplitude of the oscillations are controlled by the electromagnetic exciter and increased in small steps (about 1%) where each wave is held for 2000 seconds first before taking 1000 s of images of the waves.
    6. Measurements of the amplitude of the waves are taken by a laser
    7. Compare the amplitudes and patterns with theory as a function of driving frequency
  2. Repeat experiment with another fluid, and a non newtonian fluid and checking if theory is consistent across different fluids.
  3. Observe the effects of changing the wave form on the standing waves
    1. Sinusoidal Waves
    2. Square Waves
    3. Triangle Waves

Videos of Faraday Waves

Faraday Waves on Cornflour
Faraday Waves set to music

Group Members

  • Juan Orphee
  • Paul Cardenas-Lizana
  • Michael Lane
  • Elan Grossman

Sources

[1] M. Faraday, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 121, 319 (1831)
[2] D. Binks and W. van de Water, Phy. Rev. Lett. 78, 4043 (1997)
[3] W. Zhang and J. Viñals, Phys. Rev. E 53, R4286 (1996)
[4] Peilong Chen and J. Vinals, Phys. Rev. Lett, 79, 2670 (1997)
[5] J. Bechhoefer and B. Johnson, Am. J. Phys, 64, 12 (1996).